Worldreader is a non-profit organization whose mission is to spread literacy in underdeveloped countries by providing ereaders free of charge to school kids. These ereaders are filled with hundreds of books, providing access in a way that most of these places have never seen. The results have been impressive. As reported by Gigaom.com:

• Kids learned to use e-readers quickly even though 43 percent of them had never used a computer before. Also, not surprisingly, they were quick to discover “the multimedia aspects of the e-reader, such as music and Internet features.” (Kindle has an experimental web browser and can play MP3s.) Worldreader is “exploring ways to limit functions on the e-reader such as music” so that kids don’t get distracted during class, but points out that e-readers can also be a useful “bridge” device for students who’d never used a computer before.
• Near-zero theft. Only two e-readers (out of 600) were lost in the whole study, partly because “community involvement was encouraged through e-reader pledges, community outreach programs, and support from community leaders.”
• Kids got access to way more books. Before the study, primary-school students (whose average age was 11) had access to an average of 3.6 books at home. Junior-high students (average age 13.5 years) had access to an average of 8.6 books at home and high-school students (average age 16.6 years) access to an average of 11 books (mostly textbooks they had to buy for school.) With the e-reader program, kids had access to an average of 107 books, including books Worldreader “pushed” onto the Kindles as well as free e-books that kids downloaded themselves.
• Primary school students’ test scores improved, but effects on older kids were less clear. The reading scores of primary-school students who received e-readers increased from 12.9 percent to 15.7 percent, depending on whether they got additional reading support. That was an improvement of 4.8 percent to 7.6 percent above the scores of kids in control classrooms without e-readers. But results for older kids were mixed: “Student reading was affected almost exclusively at the primary level, and not at the junior and senior levels. This conclusion supports external data that students are most affected by reading interventions at the primary school stages between the ages of 4 and 10.”
• Students sought out access to international news. “Amazon data revealed that students were downloading The New York Times, USA Today, and El País etc., demonstrating that students want to access a wide range of reading materials that were previously inaccessible.”
• Some teachers worried kids became too dependent on the e-readers.  ”For example, one teacher stated that students thought that everything on the e-reader was the ‘absolute truth.’ He had to correct them by  explaining that the e-books may contain mistakes just as paper books do. Teachers also observed that some students have started to favor classes that use the e-reader and neglect classes that do not.”
• Kids shared their e-readers with their families and friends. Students, even primary schoolers, got to take their e-readers home at night and many reported sharing the devices. Kids in the study had an average of five siblings, so “the e-reader’s reach potentially extended to many people beyond the device’s owner.” Some kids whose parents were illiterate read to their parents from their e-readers.
• Kindles break too easily. Worldreader had not predicted how many Kindles would break: 243 out of 600, or 40.5 percent. Each time an e-reader broke, Worldreader sent it back to Amazon to conduct “a post-mortem analysis.” Turns out “fragile screens are the main weakness” and Amazon is working on Kindles with reinforced screens (at the same cost), which started shipping to Ghana in October 2011. Plus Worldreader is providing more rugged cases for the Kindles and providing more instruction on how to use them (don’t sit on it, for instance).
• The program appears cost-effective. Worldreader estimates that “for the years 2014-2018, using a calculation focused strictly on the provisioning of textbooks, the e-reader system would cost only $8.93-$11.40 more per student over a 4 year period [$0.19 to $0.24 per month] than the traditional paper book system.” That calculation is made with the assumptions that e-reader prices will fall and e-readers will become more rugged (so they break less). And of course, e-readers give students access to many books, not just textbooks.

Over at the Bluekai blog, they’ve put together an infographic of the people most likely to by ereaders such as the Kindle or Nook. It’s an attractive group, not least from a marketer’s point of view. The top groups included gift card buyers, country club members, paralegals, business travelers, ipod owners, and people well in the upper tax brackets. Oh yes, and dietitians as well… your guess is as good as ours there.

Into this attractive mix, the graphic cites that advertising will be coming to an ereader near you. And since Bloomberg predicts that ereaders will be a 77 billion dollar industry within 3 years, there will be lots of ereaders near you.

Source of original graphic.

Harris Interactive reports that those who own ereaders are twice as likely to buy 11-20 books per years as those who don’t have ereaders. Since 15% of those who don’t have ereaders plan to buy one soon, this is good news for publishing all around. It appears, ironically, that those with ereaders continue to be strong buyers of print books as well.

Ebookfriendly.com has posted an interesting infographic with the details:

Sources:
Harris Interactive
Ebookfriendly

This really is the missing link – a paper reading experience on an ereader. Can’t wait for it here…

E Ink Triton Imaging Film from E Ink Corporation on Vimeo.